Affirmative Action vs. Race-Neutral Admissions: A Case Study | WSJ

The Supreme Court has banned colleges from using race as criteria for admissions. Essentially ending the 50-year run of affirmative action programs. California banned public colleges like Berkeley and UCLA from using race in their admissions in the 1990s. Since then, a large study measuring the academic success and earnings of students before and after the ban has shown what effects “race-neutral” admissions policies have on minority students. WSJ explains how affirmative action worked, why the Supreme Court struck it down — and what we can learn from California about how higher education might look without it. 0:00 Supreme Court bans affirmative action 1:00 Admissions before race considerations 3:06 How affirmative action worked 4:58 Lessons from California 7:02 Race-neutral policies News Explainers Some days the high-speed news cycle can bring more questions than answers. WSJ’s news explainers break down the day’s biggest stories into bite-size pieces to help you make sense of the news. #SCOTUS #AffirmativeAction #WSJ