120 mm L23A1 по Т-64

This video presents 120 mm L23A1 APFSDS-T penetration against T64 tank front composite Armour. It is found that, the projectile is successfully able to penetrate the Armour. The vidoe highlites various penetration angle. The assumption are mentioned at the beginning of the video. The T-64 is a Soviet second-generation main battle tank introduced in the early 1960s. It was a more advanced counterpart to the T-62. L23A1 APFSDS is made from a tungsten–nickel–copper alloy with a 6 bladed aluminium fin and is located in a three-segment aluminium alloy saddle-type sabot. Please subscribe to our channel: Music Credits: Other Similar Videos: 1. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation 2. Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate #Failed Armor Penetration mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate 4. NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2 NATO X 50 mm Bullet Vs Armor Steel Plate # Armor Penetration Simulation 6. BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation , fixed 90 mm T33 Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing Ammunition mm NATO Vs Bulletproof Steel Vest #Armor Piercing Simulation mm M829 APFSDS Vs 125 mm BM 15 APFSDS # APFSDS Collision # Armor Piercing Simulation. Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation 11. Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank Vs Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 # Armor Penetration simulation mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation 13. 3VBM3/3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 APFSDS #APFSDS Collision 14. APFSDS Vs NERA #Non Explosive Reactive Armor 15. 125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS-T Vs Leopard 2 # Armor Penetration Simulation 16. 105 mm APFSDS-T M900 Vs Leopard 2 # Ballistic Simulation 17. 120 mm K276 APFSDS-T Vs Armour Plate #Ballistic Simulation