218: PNSO Therizinosaurus Review

๐—”๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—บ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜† Thanks to a few viewer comments (thank you ๅ…ญๅฐ้ฑผ, Jaiโ€™sOnFire, and others I have undoubtedly missed) I realise I should have been a lot clearer in my statement. The idea I should have conveyed was that the ๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ/๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ณ๐˜จ๐˜ฆ๐˜ด๐˜ต therizinosaurids were probably plantigrade, not ๐˜ข๐˜ญ๐˜ญ therizinosaurs as such. As pointed out to me, there have been reports of possibly therizinosaur footprints that show a digitigrade mode of locomotion. Most specifically, Fiorillo et al 2012. In that paper the average footprints were about 21cm and they though Erlikosaurus was a possible suitor. The Sennikov 2021 paper states Macropodosaurus as being about 50cm. Therizinosaurus is clearly a lot lar
Back to Top