๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐๐บ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฃ๐น๐ฎ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐
Thanks to a few viewer comments (thank you ๅ ญๅฐ้ฑผ, JaiโsOnFire, and others I have undoubtedly missed) I realise I should have been a lot clearer in my statement. The idea I should have conveyed was that the ๐ญ๐ข๐ณ๐จ๐ฆ/๐ญ๐ข๐ณ๐จ๐ฆ๐ด๐ต therizinosaurids were probably plantigrade, not ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ therizinosaurs as such.
As pointed out to me, there have been reports of possibly therizinosaur footprints that show a digitigrade mode of locomotion. Most specifically, Fiorillo et al 2012. In that paper the average footprints were about 21cm and they though Erlikosaurus was a possible suitor. The Sennikov 2021 paper states Macropodosaurus as being about 50cm. Therizinosaurus is clearly a lot lar